2022 Ohio Valley Conference Football

Leaders


 

Team Statistics

 

SCORING OFFENSE G TD FG XPT 2XP DXP Saf Points Avg/G
1. Lindenwood 10 53 11 44 0 0 0 395 39.5
2. Southeast Missouri 12 54 16 53 1 0 0 427 35.6
3. UT Martin 11 51 9 49 0 0 0 382 34.7
4. Tennessee Tech 11 34 10 32 0 0 0 266 24.2
5. Eastern Illinois 11 30 11 28 2 0 0 245 22.3
6. Tennessee State 11 23 15 18 0 0 0 201 18.3
7. Murray State 11 21 8 15 0 0 1 167 15.2
 
SCORING DEFENSE G TD FG XPT 2XP DXP Saf Points Avg/G
1. Southeast Missouri 12 34 12 29 1 0 0 271 22.6
2. Tennessee State 11 36 7 31 2 0 0 272 24.7
3. UT Martin 11 44 9 38 0 0 1 331 30.1
4. Eastern Illinois 11 43 15 40 0 0 0 343 31.2
5. Lindenwood 10 42 10 38 1 0 0 322 32.2
6. Tennessee Tech 11 45 16 38 0 0 0 356 32.4
7. Murray State 11 52 14 49 1 0 0 405 36.8
 
TOTAL OFFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. Lindenwood 10 1829 3262 746 5091 6.8 50 509.1
2. Southeast Missouri 12 2707 2911 833 5618 6.7 48 468.2
3. UT Martin 11 1905 2965 738 4870 6.6 47 442.7
4. Tennessee Tech 11 1913 2418 743 4331 5.8 34 393.7
5. Tennessee State 11 1459 1996 737 3455 4.7 20 314.1
6. Murray State 11 1434 1844 712 3278 4.6 21 298.0
7. Eastern Illinois 11 1642 1609 699 3251 4.7 28 295.5
 
TOTAL DEFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. Southeast Missouri 12 1282 3051 814 4333 5.3 31 361.1
2. Tennessee State 11 1907 2091 750 3998 5.3 32 363.5
3. UT Martin 11 1379 3094 778 4473 5.7 43 406.6
4. Eastern Illinois 11 1704 2798 758 4502 5.9 41 409.3
5. Tennessee Tech 11 2116 2653 763 4769 6.3 42 433.5
6. Murray State 11 2369 2724 782 5093 6.5 48 463.0
7. Lindenwood 10 2242 2449 711 4691 6.6 39 469.1
 
RUSHING OFFENSE G Att Yards Avg. TD Yards/G
1. Southeast Missouri 12 444 2707 6.1 29 225.6
2. Lindenwood 10 372 1829 4.9 19 182.9
3. Tennessee Tech 11 404 1913 4.7 14 173.9
4. UT Martin 11 347 1905 5.5 29 173.2
5. Eastern Illinois 11 427 1642 3.8 12 149.3
6. Tennessee State 11 419 1459 3.5 10 132.6
7. Murray State 11 400 1434 3.6 9 130.4
 
RUSHING DEFENSE G Att Yards Avg. TD Yards/G
1. Southeast Missouri 12 385 1282 3.3 10 106.8
2. UT Martin 11 412 1379 3.3 13 125.4
3. Eastern Illinois 11 388 1704 4.4 21 154.9
4. Tennessee State 11 421 1907 4.5 16 173.4
5. Tennessee Tech 11 427 2116 5.0 19 192.4
6. Murray State 11 416 2369 5.7 30 215.4
7. Lindenwood 10 369 2242 6.1 23 224.2
 
PASS OFFENSE G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards Avg. TD Avg/G
1. Lindenwood 10 245 374 9 65.5 3262 8.7 31 326.2
2. UT Martin 11 236 391 11 60.4 2965 7.6 18 269.5
3. Southeast Missouri 12 233 389 7 59.9 2911 7.5 19 242.6
4. Tennessee Tech 11 209 339 12 61.7 2418 7.1 20 219.8
5. Tennessee State 11 173 318 8 54.4 1996 6.3 10 181.5
6. Murray State 11 144 312 15 46.2 1844 5.9 12 167.6
7. Eastern Illinois 11 140 272 15 51.5 1609 5.9 16 146.3
 
PASS DEFENSE G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards Avg. TD Avg/G
1. Tennessee State 11 201 329 9 61.1 2091 6.4 16 190.1
2. Tennessee Tech 11 205 336 2 61.0 2653 7.9 23 241.2
3. Lindenwood 10 205 342 4 59.9 2449 7.2 16 244.9
4. Murray State 11 221 366 8 60.4 2724 7.4 18 247.6
5. Southeast Missouri 12 248 429 11 57.8 3051 7.1 21 254.2
6. Eastern Illinois 11 237 370 13 64.1 2798 7.6 20 254.4
7. UT Martin 11 211 366 17 57.7 3094 8.5 30 281.3
 
PASS EFFICIENCY G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards TD Effic.
1. Lindenwood 10 245 374 9 65.5 3262 31 161.3
2. Southeast Missouri 12 233 389 7 59.9 2911 19 135.3
3. Tennessee Tech 11 209 339 12 61.7 2418 20 134.0
4. UT Martin 11 236 391 11 60.4 2965 18 133.6
5. Tennessee State 11 173 318 8 54.4 1996 10 112.5
6. Eastern Illinois 11 140 272 15 51.5 1609 16 109.5
7. Murray State 11 144 312 15 46.2 1844 12 98.9
 
PASS DEFENSE EFFIC. G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards TD Effic.
1. Tennessee State 11 201 329 9 61.1 2091 16 125.1
2. Southeast Missouri 12 248 429 11 57.8 3051 21 128.6
3. Lindenwood 10 205 342 4 59.9 2449 16 133.2
4. Murray State 11 221 366 8 60.4 2724 18 134.8
5. Eastern Illinois 11 237 370 13 64.1 2798 20 138.4
6. UT Martin 11 211 366 17 57.7 3094 30 146.4
7. Tennessee Tech 11 205 336 2 61.0 2653 23 148.7
 
KICKOFF RETURNS G No. Yards TD Avg.
1. Southeast Missouri 12 33 768 2 23.3
2. UT Martin 11 21 459 0 21.9
3. Eastern Illinois 11 38 810 0 21.3
4. Tennessee State 11 40 816 0 20.4
5. Tennessee Tech 11 27 506 0 18.7
6. Lindenwood 10 23 428 0 18.6
7. Murray State 11 29 421 0 14.5
 
PUNT RETURN AVG G No. Yards TD Avg.
1. Lindenwood 10 12 151 1 12.6
2. Eastern Illinois 11 9 107 0 11.9
3. Murray State 11 16 149 0 9.3
4. Southeast Missouri 12 19 169 1 8.9
5. UT Martin 11 15 101 0 6.7
6. Tennessee State 11 13 61 0 4.7
7. Tennessee Tech 11 16 44 0 2.8
 
INTERCEPTIONS G No. Yards TD Avg.
1. UT Martin 11 17 220 3 12.9
2. Eastern Illinois 11 13 65 0 5.0
3. Southeast Missouri 12 11 163 1 14.8
4. Tennessee State 11 9 171 2 19.0
5. Murray State 11 8 54 0 6.8
6. Lindenwood 10 4 99 1 24.8
7. Tennessee Tech 11 2 2 0 1.0
 
PUNTING G No. Yards Avg/P Ret. Avg. TB Net/P
1. Eastern Illinois 11 53 2330 44.0 114 2.2 5 39.9
2. UT Martin 11 52 2234 43.0 152 2.9 5 38.1
3. Lindenwood 10 28 1111 39.7 65 2.3 0 37.4
4. Tennessee Tech 11 52 1979 38.1 32 0.6 1 37.1
5. Murray State 11 78 3053 39.1 217 2.8 7 34.6
6. Southeast Missouri 12 43 1612 37.5 130 3.0 2 33.5
7. Tennessee State 11 64 2449 38.3 296 4.6 6 31.8
 
KICKOFF COVERAGE G No. Yards Avg. Return TB Net Avg.
1. Tennessee Tech 11 52 3073 59.1 538 17 40.6
2. Eastern Illinois 11 48 2613 54.4 403 11 40.3
3. Lindenwood 10 70 4056 57.9 637 30 38.1
4. UT Martin 11 71 4053 57.1 724 25 38.1
5. Tennessee State 11 47 2679 57.0 682 9 37.7
6. Murray State 11 39 2166 55.5 355 17 35.5
7. Southeast Missouri 12 80 4263 53.3 1098 15 34.9
 
FIELD GOALS G Made-Att Pct.
1. Eastern Illinois 11 11-13 .846
2. Lindenwood 10 11-14 .786
3. Tennessee State 11 15-21 .714
Tennessee Tech 11 10-14 .714
5. Southeast Missouri 12 16-24 .667
6. Murray State 11 8-13 .615
7. UT Martin 11 9-15 .600
 
PAT KICKING G Made-Att Pct.
1. Southeast Missouri 12 53-53 1.000
Tennessee Tech 11 32-32 1.000
Eastern Illinois 11 28-28 1.000
4. UT Martin 11 49-50 .980
5. Lindenwood 10 44-47 .936
6. Murray State 11 15-17 .882
7. Tennessee State 11 18-21 .857
 
SACKS BY G No. Yards
1. UT Martin 11 30 206
2. Southeast Missouri 12 28 145
3. Tennessee Tech 11 25 161
Tennessee State 11 25 143
5. Murray State 11 17 117
6. Eastern Illinois 11 16 93
7. Lindenwood 10 13 100
 
SACKS AGAINST G No. Yards
1. UT Martin 11 10 78
2. Southeast Missouri 12 11 82
3. Tennessee Tech 11 14 68
4. Murray State 11 18 99
5. Eastern Illinois 11 33 232
6. Lindenwood 10 34 192
7. Tennessee State 11 38 285
 
FIRST DOWNS G Rush Pass Pen Total Avg/G
1. Southeast Missouri 12 129 136 14 279 23.2
Lindenwood 10 101 160 18 279 27.9
3. UT Martin 11 86 125 22 233 21.2
4. Tennessee Tech 11 100 103 14 217 19.7
5. Eastern Illinois 11 93 75 20 188 17.1
6. Tennessee State 11 83 86 15 184 16.7
7. Murray State 11 67 75 17 159 14.5
 
OPPONENT 1ST DOWNS G Rush Pass Pen Total Avg/G
1. UT Martin 11 80 104 22 206 18.7
2. Tennessee State 11 90 103 19 212 19.3
3. Lindenwood 10 108 103 6 217 21.7
4. Eastern Illinois 11 85 138 14 237 21.5
5. Murray State 11 103 118 19 240 21.8
6. Tennessee Tech 11 110 122 13 245 22.3
7. Southeast Missouri 12 89 136 21 246 20.5
 
3RD-DOWN CONVERSIONS G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. Lindenwood 10 64 127 50.4
2. Southeast Missouri 12 65 153 42.5
3. Eastern Illinois 11 54 149 36.2
4. Tennessee State 11 55 165 33.3
5. Tennessee Tech 11 49 150 32.7
6. UT Martin 11 39 130 30.0
7. Murray State 11 43 158 27.2
 
OPP 3RD-DN CONVERT G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. Tennessee State 11 54 151 35.8
2. Lindenwood 10 48 132 36.4
3. Murray State 11 58 152 38.2
4. Southeast Missouri 12 66 166 39.8
5. UT Martin 11 71 172 41.3
6. Eastern Illinois 11 65 150 43.3
7. Tennessee Tech 11 72 155 46.5
 
4TH-DOWN CONVERSIONS G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. Southeast Missouri 12 11 17 64.7
2. Tennessee Tech 11 18 29 62.1
3. Lindenwood 10 8 13 61.5
4. Tennessee State 11 9 20 45.0
5. Eastern Illinois 11 7 22 31.8
6. UT Martin 11 5 16 31.2
7. Murray State 11 3 17 17.6
 
OPP 4TH-DN CONVERT G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. Murray State 11 6 21 28.6
2. Tennessee Tech 11 8 20 40.0
3. Tennessee State 11 10 24 41.7
4. Southeast Missouri 12 12 24 50.0
5. Lindenwood 10 17 32 53.1
6. UT Martin 11 14 26 53.8
7. Eastern Illinois 11 8 11 72.7
 
PENALTIES G No. Yards Avg/G
1. Lindenwood 10 36 321 32.1
2. Eastern Illinois 11 49 420 38.2
3. Murray State 11 56 503 45.7
4. Tennessee Tech 11 66 511 46.5
5. Southeast Missouri 12 63 664 55.3
6. UT Martin 11 70 619 56.3
7. Tennessee State 11 86 695 63.2
 
OPPONENT PENALTIES G No. Yards Avg/G
1. Tennessee State 11 70 623 56.6
2. Eastern Illinois 11 68 607 55.2
3. Murray State 11 67 599 54.5
UT Martin 11 67 599 54.5
5. Tennessee Tech 11 58 538 48.9
6. Lindenwood 10 50 478 47.8
7. Southeast Missouri 12 56 525 43.8
 
TIME OF POSSESSION G Poss. Time Avg/G
1. Lindenwood 10 313:50 31:23
2. Southeast Missouri 12 371:11 30:55
3. Tennessee Tech 11 338:59 30:49
4. Murray State 11 332:40 30:14
5. UT Martin 11 320:42 29:09
6. Eastern Illinois 11 317:49 28:53
7. Tennessee State 11 314:46 28:36
 
Gained Lost
TURNOVER MARGIN G Fumb Int Total Fumb Int Total Margin Per/G
1. UT Martin 11 10 17 27 5 11 16 +11 1.00
2. Tennessee State 11 11 9 20 5 8 13 +7 0.64
3. Southeast Missouri 12 5 11 16 3 7 10 +6 0.50
4. Eastern Illinois 11 7 13 20 9 15 24 -4 -0.36
5. Lindenwood 10 9 4 13 8 9 17 -4 -0.40
6. Tennessee Tech 11 9 2 11 7 12 19 -8 -0.73
7. Murray State 11 3 8 11 6 15 21 -10 -0.91
 
Red Zone Touchdowns Field Goals Lost possession
RED ZONE OFFENSE G Scores-Chances  Pct. TDs Rush-Pass Made-Att Fumb Int. Downs Other
1. Lindenwood 10 40-47 85.1 34 17-17 6-8 1 2 1 1
2. Eastern Illinois 11 27-32 84.4 18 9-9 9-10 1 0 1 2
3. Southeast Missouri 12 47-58 81.0 35 18-17 12-17 1 1 2 2
4. UT Martin 11 38-47 80.9 29 19-10 9-13 2 3 0 0
5. Tennessee Tech 11 31-41 75.6 26 12-14 5-7 0 1 6 1
6. Tennessee State 11 20-29 69.0 10 6-4 10-15 0 1 3 0
7. Murray State 11 17-25 68.0 13 7-6 4-5 0 2 4 1
 
Red Zone Touchdowns Field Goals Lost possession
RED ZONE DEFENSE G Scores-Chances  Pct. TDs Rush-Pass Made-Att Fumb Int. Downs Other
1. Tennessee State 11 29-44 65.9 24 12-12 5-9 3 0 7 1
2. Southeast Missouri 12 33-45 73.3 22 9-13 11-13 1 3 5 1
3. Murray State 11 37-47 78.7 26 18-8 11-14 1 3 1 2
4. Lindenwood 10 30-38 78.9 23 15-8 7-9 3 1 2 0
5. UT Martin 11 30-36 83.3 23 13-10 7-9 0 1 3 0
6. Eastern Illinois 11 37-44 84.1 29 18-11 8-11 0 1 1 2
7. Tennessee Tech 11 40-45 88.9 25 13-12 15-19 0 0 1 0
 
ON-SIDE KICKS BY G On-side Pct.
1. Southeast Missouri 12 2-2 100.0
Murray State 11 1-1 100.0
Tennessee Tech 11 1-1 100.0
Eastern Illinois 11 1-1 100.0
5. Lindenwood 10 0-2 0.0
UT Martin 11 0-0 0.0
Tennessee State 11 0-0 0.0
 
ON-SIDE KICKS AGAINST G On-side Pct.
1. UT Martin 11 0-2 0.0
Tennessee Tech 11 0-1 0.0
Southeast Missouri 12 0-0 0.0
Murray State 11 0-0 0.0
Lindenwood 10 0-0 0.0
6. Tennessee State 11 2-2 100.0
Eastern Illinois 11 1-1 100.0
 
ATTENDANCE Home Avg   Away Avg   Neutral Avg   Total attend Avg
Eastern Illinois 5-24241 4848   6-38424 6404   0-0 0   11-62665 5697
Lindenwood 5-18647 3729   5-27161 5432   0-0 0   10-45808 4581
Murray State 5-43674 8735   6-30508 5085   0-0 0   11-74182 6744
Southeast Missouri 5-11130 2226   7-88094 12585   0-0 0   12-99224 8269
Tennessee State 5-49055 9811   5-51193 10239   1-51351 51351   11-151599 13782
Tennessee Tech 5-34553 6911   6-65061 10844   0-0 0   11-99614 9056
UT Martin 5-22364 4473   6-158477 26413   0-0 0   11-180841 16440
Totals 35-203664 5819   41-458918 11193   1-51351 51351   77-713933 9272  
 

 

Individual Statistics

 

RUSHING Cl G Att. Yards Avg. TD Long Avg/G
1. HESS, Geno-SEMO SR 12 236 1691 7.2 21 84 140.9
2. WALLACE, Zak-UTM SO 11 169 1012 6.0 16 97 92.0
3. MARTIN, Andrew-LIN JR 10 109 648 5.9 5 63 64.8
4. WITHERSPOON, Damonta-MUR JR 9 146 577 4.0 1 29 64.1
5. FRANKLIN, Sam-UTM FR 11 85 676 8.0 8 89 61.5
6. BRISTER, Cade-LIN SR 10 148 606 4.1 11 53 60.6
7. GIST, David-TTU SR 11 120 621 5.2 5 71 56.5
8. ROUSE, Jalen-TSU SO 11 129 613 4.8 2 36 55.7
9. STARLING, Devon-TSU JR 10 116 540 4.7 1 43 54.0
10. OATSVALL, Jeremiah-TTU SR 11 107 471 4.4 5 47 42.8
 
PASSING AVG/GAME Cl G Comp-Att-Int Pct. Yards TD Long Avg/G
1. BRISTER, Cade-LIN SR 10 232 - 354 - 9 65.5 3065 27 78 306.5
2. DELAURENT, Paxton-SEMO SO 10 210 - 344 - 6 61.0 2684 19 62 268.4
3. WINN, Dresser-UTM SR 11 232 - 379 - 11 61.2 2928 18 74 266.2
4. OATSVALL, Jeremiah-TTU SR 11 199 - 324 - 11 61.4 2271 19 74 206.5
5. ELLIS, Draylen-TSU JR 10 154 - 280 - 6 55.0 1806 8 67 180.6
6. DUGGER, Cole-LIN SO 10 13 - 19 - 0 68.4 197 4 43 19.7
7. MAUE, Lucas-MUR FR 9 8 - 30 - 0 26.7 143 2 70 15.9
8. MILLER, Willie-TTU SR 10 3 - 3 - 0 100.0 101 0 56 10.1
9. HALTON, Lewis-MUR SR 11 1 - 1 - 0 100.0 37 0 33 3.4
10. WILLMAN, Cooper-EIU JR 11 1 - 1 - 0 100.0 25 0 25 2.3
 
PASS EFFICIENCY Cl G Comp-Att-Int Pct. Yards TD Long Effic.
1. DUGGER, Cole-LIN SO 10 13 - 19 - 0 68.4 197 4 43 225.0
2. BRISTER, Cade-LIN SR 10 232 - 354 - 9 65.5 3065 27 78 158.4
3. DELAURENT, Paxton-SEMO SO 10 210 - 344 - 6 61.0 2684 19 62 141.3
4. WINN, Dresser-UTM SR 11 232 - 379 - 11 61.2 2928 18 74 136.0
5. OATSVALL, Jeremiah-TTU SR 11 199 - 324 - 11 61.4 2271 19 74 132.9
6. ELLIS, Draylen-TSU JR 10 154 - 280 - 6 55.0 1806 8 67 114.3
7. MAUE, Lucas-MUR FR 9 8 - 30 - 0 26.7 143 2 70 88.7
 
RECEPTIONS/GAME Cl G Rec. Yards TD Long Avg/C Avg/G Rec/G
1. ROSE, Payton-LIN SR 10 61 1149 12 64 18.8 114.9 6.1
2. DOWELL, Colton-UTM SR 11 67 1036 6 54 15.5 94.2 6.1
3. KING, Johnny-SEMO SR 12 69 797 6 33 11.6 66.4 5.8
4. SMITH, Kobe-LIN SR 10 56 727 8 78 13.0 72.7 5.6
5. TANKSLEY, DeVonte-UTM SO 10 53 653 1 69 12.3 65.3 5.3
6. FLOURNOY, Ryan-SEMO JR 12 61 984 7 62 16.1 82.0 5.1
7. VICK, Damoriea-SEMO JR 11 43 416 4 31 9.7 37.8 3.9
8. DALLAS, DeQuan-MUR SR 11 40 434 2 70 10.9 39.5 3.6
9. HOLLOMAN, J.J.-TSU SR 11 33 353 1 26 10.7 32.1 3.0
BROOKS, LaMartez-MUR SR 10 30 317 3 51 10.6 31.7 3.0
 
RECEIVE YDS/GAME Cl G Rec. Yards TD Long Rec/G Avg/C Avg/G
1. ROSE, Payton-LIN SR 10 61 1149 12 64 6.1 18.8 114.9
2. DOWELL, Colton-UTM SR 11 67 1036 6 54 6.1 15.5 94.2
3. FLOURNOY, Ryan-SEMO JR 12 61 984 7 62 5.1 16.1 82.0
4. SMITH, Kobe-LIN SR 10 56 727 8 78 5.6 13.0 72.7
5. KING, Johnny-SEMO SR 12 69 797 6 33 5.8 11.6 66.4
6. TANKSLEY, DeVonte-UTM SO 10 53 653 1 69 5.3 12.3 65.3
7. SMOOT, EJ-UTM JR 11 32 508 3 74 2.9 15.9 46.2
8. SHIELDS, Taylor-MUR SO 11 22 468 5 84 2.0 21.3 42.5
9. DALLAS, DeQuan-MUR SR 11 40 434 2 70 3.6 10.9 39.5
10. VICK, Damoriea-SEMO JR 11 43 416 4 31 3.9 9.7 37.8
 
TOTAL OFFENSE Cl G Rush Pass Plays Total Yds/G
1. BRISTER, Cade-LIN SR 10 606 3065 502 3671 367.1
2. DELAURENT, Paxton-SEMO SO 10 288 2684 415 2972 297.2
3. WINN, Dresser-UTM SR 11 7 2928 411 2935 266.8
4. OATSVALL, Jeremiah-TTU SR 11 471 2271 431 2742 249.3
5. ELLIS, Draylen-TSU JR 10 55 1806 377 1861 186.1
6. HESS, Geno-SEMO SR 12 1691 0 236 1691 140.9
7. WALLACE, Zak-UTM SO 11 1012 0 169 1012 92.0
8. MARTIN, Andrew-LIN JR 10 648 0 109 648 64.8
9. WITHERSPOON, Damonta-MUR JR 9 577 0 146 577 64.1
10. FRANKLIN, Sam-UTM FR 11 676 0 85 676 61.5
 
SCORING Cl G TD FG XPT 2XP Pts Pts/G
1. HESS, Geno-SEMO SR 12 23 0 0 0 138 11.5
2. WALLACE, Zak-UTM SO 11 16 0 0 0 96 8.7
3. PIPPIN, DC-SEMO JR 12 0 16 50 0 98 8.2
4. SEIBERT, Logan-LIN SO 10 0 11 44 0 77 7.7
5. ROSE, Payton-LIN SR 10 12 0 0 0 72 7.2
6. BRISTER, Cade-LIN SR 10 11 0 0 0 66 6.6
7. LARCO, Tyler-UTM SO 11 0 9 42 0 69 6.3
8. GALLOWAY, Stone-EIU SR 10 0 11 27 0 60 6.0
9. MOSLEY, Kaleb-TSU SR 11 0 15 18 0 63 5.7
10. OLSEN, Hayden-TTU SO 9 0 9 24 0 51 5.7
 
SCORING (TDs) Cl G TD Rush Pass Ret. PAT Pts Pts/G
1. HESS, Geno-SEMO SR 12 23 21 2 0 0 138 11.5
2. WALLACE, Zak-UTM SO 11 16 16 0 0 0 96 8.7
3. ROSE, Payton-LIN SR 10 12 0 12 0 0 72 7.2
4. BRISTER, Cade-LIN SR 10 11 11 0 0 0 66 6.6
5. GIST, David-TTU SR 11 9 5 4 0 0 54 4.9
6. SMITH, Kobe-LIN SR 10 8 0 8 0 0 48 4.8
7. FLOURNOY, Ryan-SEMO JR 12 9 1 7 1 0 54 4.5
8. FRANKLIN, Sam-UTM FR 11 8 8 0 0 0 48 4.4
9. MARTIN, Andrew-LIN JR 10 6 5 0 1 0 36 3.6
10. NELSON, DJ-UTM FR 11 6 0 6 0 0 36 3.3
 
SCORING (KICK) Cl G PATs FGs Pts Pts/G
1. PIPPIN, DC-SEMO JR 12 50-50 16-24 98 8.2
2. SEIBERT, Logan-LIN SO 10 44-47 11-14 77 7.7
3. LARCO, Tyler-UTM SO 11 42-43 9-13 69 6.3
4. GALLOWAY, Stone-EIU SR 10 27-27 11-12 60 6.0
5. MOSLEY, Kaleb-TSU SR 11 18-21 15-21 63 5.7
6. OLSEN, Hayden-TTU SO 9 24-24 9-11 51 5.7
7. BAUM, Aaron-MUR SR 10 14-15 8-13 38 3.8
8. PARKER, Devin-TTU SR 11 8-8 1-3 11 1.0
9. WEBBER, Zaden-MUR JR 11 1-2 0-0 1 0.1
 
PUNT RETURN AVG Cl G No. Yards TD Long Avg.
1. MCDONALD, Dalyn-SEMO SO 12 15 110 0 27 7.3
2. BAKER, Oshae-UTM SO 10 11 80 0 15 7.3
3. TROTTER, Boogie-TSU FR 11 11 57 0 16 5.2
 
KICK RETURN AVG Cl G No. Yards TD Long Avg.
1. MCDONALD, Dalyn-SEMO SO 12 20 522 1 97 26.1
2. AITKEN, Mark-EIU JR 9 17 408 0 80 24.0
3. ALLEN, Jayvian-TTU SO 11 14 295 0 46 21.1
4. REDD, Spencer-LIN JR 10 19 376 0 46 19.8
5. JEFFERSON, Tysean-TSU FR 9 16 309 0 37 19.3
6. GOMES, Dameon-MUR SR 10 15 232 0 31 15.5
 
ALL PURPOSE Cl G Rush Rcv PR KR Yards Yards/G
1. HESS, Geno-SEMO SR 12 1691 114 0 0 1805 150.4
2. ROSE, Payton-LIN SR 10 5 1149 0 0 1154 115.4
3. WALLACE, Zak-UTM SO 11 1012 105 0 0 1117 101.5
4. DOWELL, Colton-UTM SR 11 6 1036 0 0 1042 94.7
5. FLOURNOY, Ryan-SEMO JR 12 39 984 0 87 1110 92.5
6. SMITH, Kobe-LIN SR 10 0 727 55 52 834 83.4
7. MARTIN, Andrew-LIN JR 10 648 173 0 0 821 82.1
8. FRANKLIN, Sam-UTM FR 11 676 55 0 160 891 81.0
9. GIST, David-TTU SR 11 621 195 0 23 839 76.3
10. STARLING, Devon-TSU JR 10 540 221 0 0 761 76.1
 
PUNTING Cl G No. Yards Long Avg.
1. WILHOIT, Trey-EIU JR 11 53 2330 62 44.0
2. LARCO, Tyler-UTM SO 11 48 2094 75 43.6
3. HALTON, Lewis-MUR SR 11 72 2950 57 41.0
4. RIPPER, Riley-LIN SR 9 28 1111 57 39.7
5. BIGELOW, Nicholas-TTU SO 11 46 1816 53 39.5
6. HAYNES, Zach-SEMO JR 12 41 1612 59 39.3
7. MOSLEY, Kaleb-TSU SR 11 51 1994 58 39.1
 
FIELD GOALS Cl G Made Att. Pct. Made/G
1. MOSLEY, Kaleb-TSU SR 11 15 21 71.4 1.36
2. PIPPIN, DC-SEMO JR 12 16 24 66.7 1.33
3. GALLOWAY, Stone-EIU SR 10 11 12 91.7 1.10
SEIBERT, Logan-LIN SO 10 11 14 78.6 1.10
5. OLSEN, Hayden-TTU SO 9 9 11 81.8 1.00
6. LARCO, Tyler-UTM SO 11 9 13 69.2 0.82
7. BAUM, Aaron-MUR SR 10 8 13 61.5 0.80
8. PARKER, Devin-TTU SR 11 1 3 33.3 0.09
 
FIELD GOAL PCT Cl G Made Att. Long Pct.
1. PIPPIN, DC-SEMO JR 12 16 24 54 66.7
 
PAT KICKING PCT Cl G Made Att. Pct.
1. PIPPIN, DC-SEMO JR 12 50 50 100.0
GALLOWAY, Stone-EIU SR 10 27 27 100.0
OLSEN, Hayden-TTU SO 9 24 24 100.0
4. LARCO, Tyler-UTM SO 11 42 43 97.7
5. SEIBERT, Logan-LIN SO 10 44 47 93.6
 

TACKLES (All positions) Cl G Pos. Solo Ast. Total Avg/G Sacks
1. HICKS, Rob-UTM SR 11 LB 42 72 114 10.4 2.0
2. NORMAN, Bryce-SEMO SO 12 LB 57 62 119 9.9 2.5
3. FORD, John-UTM SR 11 LB 36 69 105 9.5 5.0
4. CARLISLE, Seth-TTU SR 11 LB 53 45 98 8.9 0.0
5. RELIFORD, Josh-TTU SR 11 DB 45 39 84 7.6 1.5
VINCENT, Jordan-EIU SO 11 DB 57 27 84 7.6 0.0
7. SAMUTA, Eric-MUR SR 10 LB 48 27 75 7.5 1.0
8. BRYANT, Jahsun-TSU SR 11 LB 39 41 80 7.3 0.5
9. JOHNSON, Lawrence-SEMO SR 12 DB 42 42 84 7.0 3.5
10. POPE, K'Vaughan-TSU SR 9 LB 28 34 62 6.9 0.5
11. BOHANEK, Colin-EIU JR 11 LB 33 40 73 6.6 0.0
12. TOLBERT, Elijawah-EIU SO 11 LB 32 38 70 6.4 1.5
13. COATES, Nick-EIU SO 11 DB 41 26 67 6.1 0.5
14. SIMS, Deven-UTM SR 11 DB 31 34 65 5.9 1.5
15. McGRUDER, Mann-LIN JR 10 DB 32 26 58 5.8 0.0
16. GRIFFIN, Tyrone-LIN SO 10 LB 25 32 57 5.7 1.0
17. LOCKETT, Lloyd-LIN SR 9 DB 31 20 51 5.7 0.0
18. WHITTEMORE, David-LIN SO 9 LB 23 27 50 5.6 0.0
19. GOATLEY, Cody-MUR SO 11 LB 29 31 60 5.5 1.0
20. FUHRMAN, Christian-SEMO SO 12 LB 33 32 65 5.4 3.0
21. McGOWAN, Jacquez-TTU FR 11 LB 30 29 59 5.4 0.5
22. GREEN, Josh-TSU JR 11 DB 28 28 56 5.1 0.0
23. DAILEY, Jamari-MUR SO 11 DB 28 27 55 5.0 0.0
EVANS, Carson-UTM SO 11 DB 14 41 55 5.0 0.0
EDWARDS, Devon-LIN SO 10 LB 28 22 50 5.0 0.0
26. POWELL, Lawaun-MUR SO 11 LB 27 25 52 4.7 3.0
27. BAKER, Oshae-UTM SO 10 DB 26 20 46 4.6 0.5
28. NEAL, TJ-UTM SR 11 LB 25 24 49 4.5 2.0
29. DOTSON, Daylan-UTM SO 11 DE 18 30 48 4.4 9.5
30. BOLDEN, Darion-LIN SR 10 DB 24 18 42 4.2 0.0
31. LEONARD, Ty-SEMO SR 12 DB 30 20 50 4.2 0.0
32. RAINES, Aidan-TTU SR 11 LB 23 21 44 4.0 1.0
WOODS, Ty-UTM SR 11 DB 22 22 44 4.0 0.5
WILLIAMS, Sterlin-LIN JR 10 DL 17 23 40 4.0 4.5
35. BURNS, Samari-TTU SO 11 DB 28 15 43 3.9 1.0
36. MCCALL, William-SEMO JR 12 DB 23 23 46 3.8 0.0
37. CRAWFORD, Michael-TSU SR 11 LB 14 28 42 3.8 0.0
GORE, Tyler-UTM SR 11 DB 28 14 42 3.8 1.0
39. JONES, Terray-TSU SR 10 DL 12 25 37 3.7 4.0
McCLENDON, Kobe-LIN FR 10 DL 13 24 37 3.7 3.0
41. IVORY JR, Eric-SEMO FR 12 DB 16 28 44 3.7 0.0
42. ALLEN Terrell-TSU JR 10 DL 20 16 36 3.6 4.5
GIORGI, Chase-LIN JR 10 LB 19 17 36 3.6 0.0
44. SHUPPERD, Cade-MUR SO 11 LB 24 15 39 3.5 5.0
45. HUDSON, Cameron-TTU JR 9 DB 23 8 31 3.4 0.0
46. HARVEY, Tyris-EIU JR 10 DB 24 10 34 3.4 0.0
47. PATRICK, Jayden-LIN FR 10 DB 27 6 33 3.3 0.0
48. JOHNSON, Justus-MUR FR 11 DB 21 15 36 3.3 0.0
LONG, Andrew-MUR SO 11 LB 22 14 36 3.3 3.0
50. PETTI, Dylan-LIN SR 10 DL 10 22 32 3.2 1.0
 
SACKS Cl G Pos. Solo Ast. Yards Total Avg/G
1. DOTSON, Daylan-UTM SO 11 DE 7 5 72 9.5 0.86
2. FORD, John-UTM SR 11 LB 4 2 35 5.0 0.45
SHUPPERD, Cade-MUR SO 11 LB 5 0 34 5.0 0.45
4. WILLIAMS, Sterlin-LIN JR 10 DL 4 1 34 4.5 0.45
5. PATTERSON, Tadarrius-TSU SR 11 DL 3 3 27 4.5 0.41
6. ALLEN Terrell-TSU JR 10 DL 4 1 17 4.5 0.45
7. JONES, Terray-TSU SR 10 DL 3 2 40 4.0 0.40
8. BOOKER, Keandre-SEMO SR 12 LB 3 2 23 4.0 0.33
9. NASH, Davion-TSU SR 10 LB 3 2 19 4.0 0.40
10. CAIRO, Nasim-SEMO FR 12 DL 2 4 13 4.0 0.33
11. JOHNSON, Lawrence-SEMO SR 12 DB 3 1 30 3.5 0.29
12. LONG, Andrew-MUR SO 11 LB 3 0 23 3.0 0.27
13. McCLENDON, Kobe-LIN FR 10 DL 2 2 23 3.0 0.30
14. LEACH, Cameron-EIU SR 11 DL 3 0 22 3.0 0.27
TUCKER, Hudson-TTU SO 11 DL 3 0 20 3.0 0.27
16. BARROWS, Joel-EIU JR 10 DL 3 0 18 3.0 0.30
MILES, Jordan-EIU JR 10 DE 3 0 18 3.0 0.30
18. POWELL, Lawaun-MUR SO 11 LB 3 0 15 3.0 0.27
19. FUHRMAN, Christian-SEMO SO 12 LB 3 0 14 3.0 0.25
20. NORMAN, Bryce-SEMO SO 12 LB 2 1 17 2.5 0.21
 
TACKLES FOR LOSS Cl G Pos. Solo Ast. Yards Total Avg/G
1. DOTSON, Daylan-UTM SO 11 DE 10 9 85 14.5 1.32
2. ALLEN Terrell-TSU JR 10 DL 11 2 38 12.0 1.20
3. FORD, John-UTM SR 11 LB 6 9 46 10.5 0.95
4. SHUPPERD, Cade-MUR SO 11 LB 8 2 43 9.0 0.82
PATTERSON, Tadarrius-TSU SR 11 DL 6 6 44 9.0 0.82
6. RELIFORD, Josh-TTU SR 11 DB 5 7 30 8.5 0.77
7. GOATLEY, Cody-MUR SO 11 LB 5 6 22 8.0 0.73
POWELL, Lawaun-MUR SO 11 LB 7 2 31 8.0 0.73
TUCKER, Hudson-TTU SO 11 DL 7 2 33 8.0 0.73
10. BOOKER, Keandre-SEMO SR 12 LB 5 5 35 7.5 0.62
CAIRO, Nasim-SEMO FR 12 DL 3 9 25 7.5 0.62
12. LEWIS, Tre'Jon-EIU JR 11 DL 7 1 26 7.5 0.68
13. JOHNSON, Lawrence-SEMO SR 12 DB 6 3 42 7.5 0.62
FUHRMAN, Christian-SEMO SO 12 LB 6 3 24 7.5 0.62
15. WILLIAMS, Sterlin-LIN JR 10 DL 6 3 41 7.5 0.75
16. NEAL, TJ-UTM SR 11 LB 6 3 27 7.5 0.68
17. McCLENDON, Kobe-LIN FR 10 DL 5 4 34 7.0 0.70
18. BOHANEK, Colin-EIU JR 11 LB 5 4 12 7.0 0.64
19. TOLBERT, Elijawah-EIU SO 11 LB 4 5 12 6.5 0.59
SIMS, Deven-UTM SR 11 DB 6 1 24 6.5 0.59
 
PASSES DEFENDED Cl G BrUp Int. Total Avg/G
1. BOLDEN, Darion-LIN SR 10 13 2 15 1.50
2. GORE, Tyler-UTM SR 11 8 2 10 0.91
PHILLIPS, Bryce-TSU FR 11 10 0 10 0.91
4. BAKER, Oshae-UTM SO 10 8 1 9 0.90
5. WOODS, Ty-UTM SR 11 6 3 9 0.82
TURNER, Quinaz-MUR SR 11 5 4 9 0.82
7. PATRICK, Jayden-LIN FR 10 8 0 8 0.80
8. HUDSON, Cameron-TTU JR 9 7 0 7 0.78
9. JOHNSON, Lawrence-SEMO SR 12 8 1 9 0.75
10. VINCENT, Jordan-EIU SO 11 5 3 8 0.73
HOLMES, Cayvian-MUR JR 11 8 0 8 0.73
12. HINES, Wesley-LIN JR 10 7 0 7 0.70
13. HODGES, Trai-SEMO SR 12 7 1 8 0.67
14. HOLLIS, Fondren-TSU SO 10 6 0 6 0.60
15. RELIFORD, Josh-TTU SR 11 6 0 6 0.55
GREEN, Josh-TSU JR 11 3 3 6 0.55
TOLBERT, Elijawah-EIU SO 11 3 3 6 0.55
18. NORMAN, Bryce-SEMO SO 12 5 1 6 0.50
NELOME, Tyler-SEMO JR 10 4 1 5 0.50
IVORY JR, Eric-SEMO FR 12 5 1 6 0.50
 
INTERCEPTIONS Cl G No. Yards TD Long Avg/G
1. TURNER, Quinaz-MUR SR 11 4 50 0 45 0.36
2. GREEN, Josh-TSU JR 11 3 70 1 52 0.27
WOODS, Ty-UTM SR 11 3 62 1 39 0.27
TOLBERT, Elijawah-EIU SO 11 3 20 0 20 0.27
VINCENT, Jordan-EIU SO 11 3 8 0 8 0.27
6. BOLDEN, Darion-LIN SR 10 2 99 1 99 0.20
HARVEY, Tyris-EIU JR 10 2 12 0 12 0.20
8. GORE, Tyler-UTM SR 11 2 30 0 30 0.18
BOHANEK, Colin-EIU JR 11 2 21 0 20 0.18
BRYANT, Jahsun-TSU SR 11 2 1 0 1 0.18
 
FUMBLES FORCED Cl G No. Avg/G
1. DOTSON, Daylan-UTM SO 11 5 0.45
2. WHITTEMORE, David-LIN SO 9 2 0.22
3. SWAFFORD, Aaron-TTU SO 10 2 0.20
WILLIAMS, Sterlin-LIN JR 10 2 0.20
5. NEAL, TJ-UTM SR 11 2 0.18
GORE, Tyler-UTM SR 11 2 0.18
BOHANEK, Colin-EIU JR 11 2 0.18
VINCENT, Jordan-EIU SO 11 2 0.18
RELIFORD, Josh-TTU SR 11 2 0.18
BRYANT, Jahsun-TSU SR 11 2 0.18
 
FUMBLES RECOVERED Cl G No. Avg/G
1. LOCKETT, Lloyd-LIN SR 9 2 0.22
HUDSON, Cameron-TTU JR 9 2 0.22
3. ROGERS, Jay-UTM JR 11 2 0.18
EVANS, Carson-UTM SO 11 2 0.18
DOTSON, Daylan-UTM SO 11 2 0.18
HAWKINS, Davoan-TSU SR 11 2 0.18
7. HOLMES, LaWilliam-SEMO SR 9 1 0.11
VICTOR, Darnel-MUR SR 9 1 0.11
WHITTEMORE, David-LIN SO 9 1 0.11
WOODS, Henry-EIU SO 9 1 0.11